People, Not Data
The importance of empathy in Civic Tech.





dis·dain verb: consider to be unworthy of one’s consideration.This disdain shows in huge, controversial, life-changing ways. We take 260 days to get disability benefits to our veterans. We spend $3,000 to room a family for a month while the family begs for $900 in cash instead. And the disdain shows in small, quiet, often unnoticed ways. Try to apply online for free school meals in SF and you’ll find this warning highlighted on the welcome screen:
Please only fill out one application online. If you make any errors you will need to fill out a paper application.
Or download the Calwin iPhone app, the companion application to the ~$750 million client welfare data system in California, and this is what you’ll see:
…one privilege the insured and well-off have is to excuse the terrible quality of services the government routinely delivers to the poor. Too often, the press ignores — or simply never knows — the pain and trouble of interfacing with government bureaucracies that the poor struggle with daily. That can allow the problems in those bureaucracies to fester. — Ezra KleinThe problem is not the website. It’s the man on his knees at twelve-thirty-five and the disdainful machine that doesn’t help him up. Let’s build with empathy So here we are, struggling against our own disdainful machine. And nobody wants it. The worker doesn’t want clients on their knees. The CalWin developer doesn’t want his work embarrassingly truncated on the home screen. Nobody wants homeless people waiting in line all night. It goes beyond politics. I wish I could end this with a heroic call-to-action. “Are you with me? Do YOU want to fix our broken government?? Click here to donate now!!” But I can’t. My fellowship year clarified more problems than solutions. Instead, I’ll offer a question: How can we build empathetic government services? Well, first things first: User needs. An empathetic service would ground itself in the concrete needs of concrete people. It’s not about innovation, big data, government-as-a-platform, transparency, crowd-funding, open data, or civic tech. It’s about people. Learning to prioritize people and their needs will be a long slog. It’s the kind of change that happens slowly, one person at a time. But we should start. We have so much creativity, so many tools, and so many awesome examples to help us identify, document, describe, and address user needs. But we’re not doing it. I feel awkward and ashamed to know the relative sizes of all 400 Sci-Fi starships, but I barely have a clue how our homeless shelters or prisons work. Amidst the anger and insults of healthcare.gov, Tim O’Reilly reminds us of the immense opportunity:
Rather than bemoaning the problems with healthcare.gov and seeking to find fault and political advantage, now is a great time to seize the moment and commit ourselves to create government services that give all citizens services that are simple, effective, and easy to use. — Tim O’ReillySo let’s gently but persistently bring our awareness back to users and build an empathetic machine; one that finds the man on his knees and helps him up. This article was first published on Medium by Jake Solomon of Code for America. It was published in 2014 and shows the importance of good service design in public services.